Incidence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in children undergoing elective otolaryngologic surgery throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: Children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are less clinically affected than adults, with most cases presenting as asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. However, true rates of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in children remain unclear. We sought to examine rates of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic children and the role of children in transmission. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients between 6 months and 17 years of age who underwent elective or semi-elective otolaryngologic surgery with physicians affiliated with Weill Cornell Medicine between May 15, 2020 and March 31, 2022. Patients were included if they received molecular assay testing for SARS-CoV-2 without SARS-CoV-2 symptoms within 5 days of scheduled surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection status, exposure, clinical symptoms, demographic data, and insurance status were recorded. Results: 1047 patients met inclusion criteria. Thirteen positive cases (1.24%) were identified in the study population. Six cases occurred between December 2021 and February 2022 following the classification of the omicron variant as a variant of concern in November 2021. Five of the 13 cases occurred in children under 2 years of age. Seven patients were male, and five were female. Residences spanned all five boroughs of New York City and the surrounding metropolitan area. Conclusion: Throughout the pandemic, children have had a low rate of asymptomatic disease and likely pose a low risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to the general population. Our results suggest that testing of asymptomatic children is a low-yield practice that is unlikely to influence rates of SARS-CoV-2 in the general population. Level of Evidence: 3.

Tympanostomy tubes in the age of quarantine.

OBJECTIVES: After state-mandated COVID-19 quarantine measures were lifted in 2020, pediatric otolaryngologists noticed that many children who were previously scheduled for tympanostomy tube (TT) placement for indications of acute otitis media (AOM) or chronic middle ear effusions (OME) no longer required surgery. This study aims to describe the effect of home-quarantine on pediatric patients with recurrent AOM and OME to increase our understanding of these conditions. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of pediatric patients that were originally scheduled for TT for recurrent AOM and/or OME, but had their procedure cancelled due to COVID-19. The chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of patients who no longer met indications for surgery stratified by original indication. Data was also collected for TT volume in the months before and after the start of the pandemic. RESULTS: Of 59 patients originally scheduled for TT, 31.0% of the 42 patients who returned for follow-up still met indications for a procedure after a period of home-quarantine. Of these, 76.9% had persistent OME, 61.5% had recurrent AOM, and 69.2% had persistent conductive hearing loss. After elective surgery resumed, there was a substantial decrease in the number of TT procedures performed compared to pre-pandemic data. CONCLUSION: After a period of quarantine, many patients previously scheduled for TT experienced resolution of their AOM or OME. Despite a nationwide recovery in outpatient surgical volume across otolaryngology practices, TT volumes remain low one year after the start of the pandemic, suggesting that continued COVID-19 precautionary measures are contributing to this lingering effect.

Establishing an Office-Based Framework for Resuming Otolaryngology Care in Academic Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 health crisis abruptly disrupted the practice of otolaryngology. This article aims to define the changes needed to operate an academic otolaryngology practice safely and efficiently from within the epicenter of the pandemic. We define the areas of normal patient workflow that have been affected by COVID-19, and we offer mitigation strategies with attention paid to the specific needs of subspecialties. DATA SOURCES: The article includes data specific to the office practice metrics of the Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, as well as publically available data from New York Presbyterian Hospital system and the New York Times. REVIEW METHODS: Expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Through careful planning and execution, it is possible to reestablish safe otolaryngologic patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will require a significant change from prior practice models for successful implementation. Additionally, telemedicine can be positively integrated into the treatment of otolaryngology diseases for new and established patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The information conveyed in this review can be used as a guide by large and small otolaryngology groups to identify aspects of the patient visit that are "at risk" due to COVID-19, and it suggests sensible responses that can be made without a significant disruption to normal practice. The methods used to identify vulnerabilities with the patient visit process can be applied to future unforeseen crises, such as a resurgence of COVID-19 or a novel pandemic.